Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Below are some examples of structures where clients may feel they require divisions – with an analysis of appropriateness.

Franchises

Bob owns a cleaning company "Cloud Clean", which he has recently franchised. While each of the franchisees are responsible for the day to day running of their own businesses, part of the contract is that Bob will specify the way his company is represented in the market. Bob would also like to monitor the performance and effectiveness of each of the franchises and allocate the sales inquiries to the correct franchise. Bob holds the domain for @cloudclean.com and all the franchises will use this.
This environment is a good reason to use Divisions.
Bob will be able to create the applicable Action Types, with documents, branding, knowledge base and wiki; thus being assured that Cloud Clean is represented the way Bob prescribes in the market place. Each of the franchises will be able to run their own business as an individual entity – without seeing records not belonging to their franchise. Sales Inquiries will come into the Root Division and Bob will allocate to the franchise on creation of the action. Bob is able to compile views and reports based on the actions of all Franchises. Each user will have an email address @cloudclean.com.

The Legal Company | Services Company

Common email domain

Steven is practise manager at a Law Firm "You Matter". While the Law firm has a number of lawyers, runs a trust account and does client billing; the non-lawyer employees are employed by a separate company "Legal Services Inc" which also runs the practise and bills the law firm for its services. These companies are separate entities as a clear division is required for compliance reasons. All employees of both companies use an email address of @you matter.com.

This environment is a good reason to use Divisions.
The staff in the services company will be able to see the matters in the legal company – thus giving the ability to create documents etc. The accounting will be separated into each company.

Email Domain not common


Jenny is practise manager at a Law Firm "Matter Magic". While the Law firm has a number of lawyers, runs a trust account and does client billing; the non-lawyer employees are employed by a separate company "Practice Perfect" which also runs the practise and bills the law firm for its services. These companies are separate entities as a clear division is required for compliance reasons. Matter Magic has the email domain of @mattermagic.com , Practice Perfect has @practiceperfect.com
This environment is an awkward match for Divisions.
A decision will need to be made about how to manage the global set up of the email. It may be that the benefits outweigh the email issue in this scenario.

The Branch | Department Environment (Cost Centres)

With Accounting


Mary is the owner of a web design company; the company has multiple offices but is one accounting entity – using ActionStep Actionstep Accounting. Mary would like to use divisions so that she can use the divisional merge field on documents and to track the profitability of each of the branches.
This environment not good for Divisions
Where accounting is used and the company is common (using a shared bank account and tax reporting) Divisions cannot be used.
The same outcome can be found using Participant Types.
Mary will need to add the "Branch" as a participant type in each of her Action Types.
A General Action type will need to be included – for tracking expenses.
The Chart of Accounts should be set so that all Income, Cost and Expense accounts require an Action.
Sales and Cost of Sales would be related to their Action – as per the norm, the expenses would be coded to the Action tracking expenses.
Using the Income by Participant report – where the branch is the participant, would show the profitability of each Branch.
For Merge field use pt=Branch would give the options.
The Participant would also be able to be set as a field in the list view options – giving the ability to filter.
If Mary does not want employees of one branch seeing the work of other branches, she may need to add a participant type to each action for permission reasons.

Info
titleNote
This same scenario can be applied where a company runs multiple departments or cost centers.

Without Accounting


Mike works for a large company where they have separate offices and wish to divide the Actions between them for permission, documents generation and reporting reasons. They are not using ActionStep Actionstep Accounting.
This environment is good for Divisions.
We have many large corporate clients on ActionStep Actionstep who are not using Accounting and are on a divisional structure for their databases.

Info
titleNote
Creating permissions for users who may be able to see actions in some divisions and not others is possible; however, it can be tricky to unwind if roles and |or structure change. If using this method, ensure adequate testing is done around each of the roles

.